Edward D Morris’ “Tuck
in that t-shirt!' race, class, gender, and discipline in an urban
school” allowed me to reflect on my experiences in schooling, it
reminded me mostly of my experiences in high school. Morris’ (2005)
main focus in his research was to “show how educators identified
students deemed deficient in cultural capital, especially in terms of
manners and dress, and attempted to reform these perceived
deficiencies through regulating their bodies” (p.26). He
illustrates how race, class and gender played a role in this process
and how perceptions “guided educators” (Morris, 2005) assumptions
of which students lacked cultural capital and which students required
discipline. In this reflection I will focus on concepts from Morris
and apply them to my experience of high school with some specific and
first hand examples.
I did not attend an urban
school like the one that Morris works in for his research, however
many of these concepts and ideas like bodily discipline and rules for
clothing and so forth are still relevant as they are generally the
same in most schools. I was enrolled in a rural area high school in
which people from surrounding areas had to attend because their town
didn’t have a high school. this meant that there was a mix of
different sub cultures and style differences. The school was
comprised of
mainly white working class and lower middle class students, but the educators seemed to persist on pushing an upper class-like order upon them. Many of the working class students, the ones who took shop classes and other trades classes, were a group treated poorly due to their resistance to dress codes and “appropriate” actions. These students, quite a large population of the school, would wear work boots, camouflage hats and jackets, Dickies work pants and other similar garments in which they were trying to achieve a “working class look”. Although it’s not an example of racial marginalization, this group was still deemed an opposition to what the school and educators wanted and therefore they were perceived as deficient, even to other students, when they were simply following the norms of their community. Morris has an example of this from his research in Matthews Middle School where a girl named Carla is perceived of wearing “ganglike attire” “While normative in her neighborhood, [her clothing] acquired the connotation of opposition within the school walls, causing educators there to assume she did not care about school” (p.27). Just like Carla is categorized as looking like she is part of a gang because of dress (in her case race as well), the students in my school who had the working class look had educators assuming that this group did not care about school when they were simply conforming to the norms of the small working class town in which they are from.
mainly white working class and lower middle class students, but the educators seemed to persist on pushing an upper class-like order upon them. Many of the working class students, the ones who took shop classes and other trades classes, were a group treated poorly due to their resistance to dress codes and “appropriate” actions. These students, quite a large population of the school, would wear work boots, camouflage hats and jackets, Dickies work pants and other similar garments in which they were trying to achieve a “working class look”. Although it’s not an example of racial marginalization, this group was still deemed an opposition to what the school and educators wanted and therefore they were perceived as deficient, even to other students, when they were simply following the norms of their community. Morris has an example of this from his research in Matthews Middle School where a girl named Carla is perceived of wearing “ganglike attire” “While normative in her neighborhood, [her clothing] acquired the connotation of opposition within the school walls, causing educators there to assume she did not care about school” (p.27). Just like Carla is categorized as looking like she is part of a gang because of dress (in her case race as well), the students in my school who had the working class look had educators assuming that this group did not care about school when they were simply conforming to the norms of the small working class town in which they are from.
This small town school is
predominantly white and only had about three people of other races
when I had attended. Racism was expressed overtly in many cases by
students but was also exerted by the school systemically. In this
research Morris mentions that control and resistance to clothing
styles and manners leads to a focus on discipline “Schools use this
discipline to rework the behavior and appearance of students so their
bodies display acceptable, normative comportment (Morris, 2005,
p.27). One time when I was in the office in my school waiting to see
the principal when I overheard the secretary call a class on the p.a
system as they had requested to have a student come to the office. He
arrived, it was the new student who was Latino and just moved into
town from an urban area in Toronto. The guidance councilor didn’t
take him in to his office but rather came out into the front of the
office and told this student that he had to change his clothing style
as it reflected “ganglike attire”. The educator requested no long
t- shirts, no tucking pants into his socks and so forth. I had seen
many teachers tell students to change attires for wearing “ganglike
attires” as many students perceived it as a stylish trend, but in
this case the student was most likely wearing what was acceptable and
normative in the urban area of Toronto. He had refused to change his
attire, rightfully in my opinion, and though I do not know if he was
disciplined for opposing this request it is most likely the case.
Like Morris discusses, all
students are ordered to dress and display a certain look by
educators. Even in the case of my school, which has no school
uniforms, the educators and dominating white upper class are the
arbiters of what is acceptable behavior and dress. I think Morris’
research is relatively well done as it is successful in generalizing
the education system as a whole and is not limited to just an urban
middle school.
Morris, E. W. (2005). "Tuck in that Shirt!" Race, Class, Gender and Discipline in an Urban School. Sociological Perspectives, 48, 1, 25-48. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/sable/10.1525/sop.2005.48.1.25
Morris, E. W. (2005). "Tuck in that Shirt!" Race, Class, Gender and Discipline in an Urban School. Sociological Perspectives, 48, 1, 25-48. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/sable/10.1525/sop.2005.48.1.25
No comments:
Post a Comment